Wimbledon 2019: Alison Riske Upsets No. 1 Ashleigh Barty


WIMBLEDON, England — Top-seeded Ashleigh Barty turned the best ranked participant to fall at Wimbledon, dropping, Three-6, 6-2, 6-Three, to Alison Riske within the fourth spherical on Monday afternoon.

Barty, 23, entered the match with supreme confidence and was the oddsmakers’ favourite. In June, she gained the French Open and have become the primary Australian lady atop the world rankings since Evonne Goolagong-Cawley in 1976. She had gained her final 15 matches and performed flawlessly throughout Wimbledon’s first week, dropping no units and solely 12 video games.

When she opened up her fourth-round match with 4 straight aces and took the primary set with straightforward effectivity, it seemed as if her profitable streak would develop and he or she would quickly be within the Wimbledon quarterfinals for the primary time.

But Riske, a 29-year-old American ranked 55th, has been a powerful grass-court participant all through her profession and gained a match on the floor final month. She performed steadily, blasting her laborious, flat groundstrokes deep, usually taking part in to Barty’s harmful backhand. She put strain on Barty by coming to internet 27 occasions and profitable 74 p.c of these factors.

“The grass really brings out the best of me,” Riske instructed ESPN’s Tom Rinaldi after the match. “It really suits my game.”

When Riske broke serve early within the second set and held on to win it, 6-2, the capability crowd of four,000 on No. 2 Court erupted in full-throated applause.

Barty had gained 9 out of her 11 three-set matches on tour this yr, however she succumbed to Riske’s relentless strain and deeply struck groundstrokes.

Riske additionally gained her earlier three matches in three units, together with a 9-7 third set in her second-round win over Ivana Jorovic. She has now crushed the No. 1, No. 13 and No. 22 seeds at this match.

She will subsequent play the seven-time Wimbledon champion Serena Williams, who defeated Carla Suárez Navarro, 6-2, 6-2.



Source link Nytimes.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *