The query of Mr. Manafort’s detention was one in all the first high-profile issues to be undertaken by Mr. Rosen, who was confirmed as the deputy lawyer normal on May 16, sooner or later earlier than Mr. Manafort’s lawyer requested the Bureau of Prisons to maintain his consumer out of Rikers.
In the weeks after his consumer was charged, Mr. Blanche objected to Mr. Manafort being held at Rikers. In a May 17 letter, he requested the warden at the federal jail in Pennsylvania not to approve New York’s request that Mr. Manafort be transferred to state custody, citing his age and well being points.
In the letter, a duplicate of which was reviewed by The New York Times, Mr. Blanche additionally criticized the costs towards his consumer, arguing that they had been “a blatant violation” of New York’s double jeopardy legal guidelines and calling the case “politics at its worst.” The district lawyer’s workplace has mentioned it’s assured the costs will stand.
Mr. Blanche additionally mentioned in his letter that the New York prosecutors had been “insisting that Mr. Manafort remain on Rikers Island, likely in solitary confinement, pending trial.”
While Mr. Blanche’s letter indicated that copies had been despatched to Mr. Vance by electronic mail and registered mail, different correspondence and folks with information of the matter indicated Mr. Vance’s workplace didn’t obtain the letter.
Instead, Mr. Rosen wrote to Mr. Vance final week, asking whether or not his workplace was going to reply.
A senior Justice Department official mentioned that the Bureau of Prisons had been holding the Justice Department apprised of Mr. Manafort’s state of affairs, given the high-profile nature of his case. Mr. Rosen sought Mr. Vance’s response largely due to these briefings, the official mentioned.
Mr. Vance replied on Friday, dismissing what he referred to as Mr. Blanche’s “gratuitous claims” that the prosecution was politically motivated and violated double jeopardy protections. He mentioned these arguments had been irrelevant to a routine dialogue about the place Mr. Manafort can be held.
In his letter, Mr. Vance mentioned New York prosecutors took no place on whether or not Mr. Manafort must be held at Rikers, however that holding him in Pennsylvania didn’t seem to be a reliable choice beneath the legislation and was not in line with how different inmates had been handled.