If it was not already clear, securities regulators are giving Elon Musk, the chief government of Tesla, a laundry listing of issues he can’t riff about on Twitter.
A revised settlement between Mr. Musk and the Securities and Exchange Commission, filed in federal court docket in Manhattan on Friday, spells out simply when Mr. Musk should “obtain the preapproval of any experienced securities lawyer” employed by Tesla earlier than posting on Twitter or different social media.
The listing contains feedback in regards to the electric-car firm’s monetary situation, earnings forecast, proposed acquisitions and manufacturing knowledge. But it additionally covers remarks about “nonpublic legal or regulatory findings or decisions” and any occasion that Tesla must confide in the S.E.C. in a regulatory submitting.
A footnote to the settlement stated, “This list is not intended to be an exhaustive list of topics,” which means Mr. Musk is on discover to tread rigorously when speaking about something that would transfer the corporate’s inventory value.
If accredited by a federal choose, the deal would resolve an try by regulators to carry Mr. Musk in contempt of court docket for violating the sooner settlement.
The settlement was modified after Judge Alison J. Nathan of Federal District Court in Manhattan stated at a hearing this month that the original settlement, approved in October, had a “lack of clarity.”
Judge Nathan asked the parties to try to draft a deal that better explained how Tesla’s lawyers should vet Mr. Musk’s posts and that included detailed procedures for dealing with posts that contained potential market-sensitive information.
Urging the two sides to “take a deep breath” and put on “their reasonableness pants,” she gave the lawyers two weeks to report back. Last week, she agreed to a request by the commission and Mr. Musk for an additional week.
Apparently nodding to Judge Nathan’s request, the new proposed settlement said the “enhanced clarity” as to which topics Mr. Musk cannot comment on without a lawyer’s approval should “reduce the likelihood of future disputes regarding compliance.”
The latest regulatory scuffle between the S.E.C. and Mr. Musk was prompted by a Feb. 19 Twitter post by Mr. Musk that included information, which had not been reviewed by a lawyer, about the number of cars Tesla would produce and deliver this year.
The commission contended that the post violated the terms of the October settlement, which followed the S.E.C.’s filing of a civil fraud complaint against Tesla and Mr. Musk over his declaration on Twitter that he had “funding secured” to take the company private at $420 a share. The prospect pushed Tesla shares sharply higher. But it turned out that Mr. Musk and Tesla were not actually close to reaching such a deal.
Under the original settlement, Tesla was required to establish procedures for vetting Mr. Musk’s written communications, including Twitter posts, that might contain material information about the company.
At the court hearing this month on the S.E.C.’s request for a contempt citation, John Hueston, a lawyer for Mr. Musk, argued that the settlement was imprecise and had resulted in a “murky policy” governing when Tesla’s lawyers had to review Mr. Musk’s posts. Cheryl Crumpton, a lawyer for the S.E.C., disagreed, but Judge Nathan indicated that she was inclined to agree with Mr. Hueston.
Mr. Musk, who attended the hearing but did not speak, nodded at some of the judge’s comments. He later issued a statement supporting her order directing the parties to revisit the settlement.
The Tesla chief executive has long feuded with the S.E.C., which he once derided on Twitter as the “Shortseller Enrichment Committee,’’ echoing his complaint that the bearish investors known as short-sellers spread damaging and false information about the company.
But putting the dispute behind him may have become more urgent in light of his company’s recent financial performance.
On Wednesday, Tesla gave even its most ardent supporters on Wall Street little to cheer about when it reported a $702 million quarterly loss. Sales of the company’s electric cars fell 31 percent from the fourth quarter.
Shares of Tesla have tumbled 9 percent since the earnings report. The stock, which as recently as Thursday had a bigger market capitalization than Ford Motor, closed at $235.14 on Friday, its lowest level since early 2017. The stock was up about 1 percent in extended trading after the deal between Mr. Musk and the S.E.C. was filed in court.
Some investors have complained that Mr. Musk’s battles with the commission have become an unnecessary distraction for him and the company.
Securities lawyers said the revised list of things that Mr. Musk could not discuss on Twitter without seeking a lawyer’s approval seemed reasonable.
“It recognizes that investors are smart enough to distinguish between tweets that contain material information regarding the company and its securities, on the one hand, and ‘Elon being Elon,’ on the other,” said Marc Leaf, a partner at Drinker Biddle & Reath in New York, who has previously worked at the S.E.C.